You Should Know CONCERNING THE Health Effects of Cannabis – Informed Opinions

Enter any bar or public place and canvass opinions on cannabis and you will see a different opinion for each person canvassed. Some opinions will be well-informed from respectable sources while others will be just formed upon no basis at all. To be certain, research and conclusions in line with the research is difficult given the long history of illegality.

Nevertheless, there exists a groundswell of opinion that cannabis is good and should be legalised. Many States in the us and Australia have taken the path to legalise cannabis. Other countries are either following suit or considering options. So what is the position now? Could it be good or not?

The National Academy of Sciences published a 487 page report this season (NAP Report) on the existing state of evidence for the subject matter. Many government grants supported the task of the committee, an eminent assortment of 16 professors. These were supported by 15 academic reviewers plus some 700 relevant publications considered. Thus the report sometimes appears as state of the art on medical as well as recreational use. This short article draws heavily with this resource.

The term cannabis can be used loosely here to represent cannabis and marijuana, the latter being sourced from a different the main plant. More than 100 chemical compounds are found in cannabis, each potentially offering differing benefits or risk.


Someone who is “stoned” on smoking cannabis might experience a euphoric state where time is irrelevant, music and colours take on a greater significance and the individual might acquire the “nibblies”, wanting to eat sweet and fatty foods. This is connected with impaired motor skills and perception. When high blood concentrations are achieved, paranoid thoughts, hallucinations and anxiety attacks may characterize his “trip”.


In the vernacular, cannabis is frequently characterized as “good shit” and “bad shit”, alluding to widespread contamination practice. The contaminants will come from soil quality (eg pesticides & heavy metals) or added subsequently. Sometimes particles of lead or tiny beads of glass augment the weight sold.


A random collection of therapeutic effects appears within context of these evidence status. Some of the effects will undoubtedly be shown as beneficial, while some carry risk. Some effects are barely distinguished from the placebos of the research.

Cannabis in the treating epilepsy is inconclusive on account of insufficient evidence.

Nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy can be ameliorated by oral cannabis.
A reduction in the severity of pain in patients with chronic pain is a likely outcome for the usage of cannabis.
Spasticity in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients was reported as improvements in symptoms.

Increase in appetite and reduction in weight reduction in HIV/ADS patients has been proven in limited evidence.

In accordance with limited evidence cannabis is ineffective in the treating glaucoma.
On the basis of limited evidence, cannabis works well in the treating Tourette syndrome.

Post-traumatic disorder has been helped by cannabis within a reported trial.
Limited statistical evidence points to raised outcomes for traumatic brain injury.
There’s insufficient evidence to declare that cannabis can help Parkinson’s disease.
Limited evidence dashed hopes that cannabis may help improve the outward indications of dementia sufferers.

Limited statistical evidence are available to support a link between smoking cannabis and heart attack.
Based on limited evidence cannabis is ineffective to take care of depression
The evidence for reduced risk of metabolic issues (diabetes etc) is limited and statistical.

Social anxiety disorders can be helped by cannabis, even though evidence is bound. Asthma and cannabis use is not well supported by the data either for or against.

Post-traumatic disorder has been helped by cannabis within a reported trial.

A conclusion that cannabis can help schizophrenia sufferers can’t be supported or refuted based on the limited nature of the data.

There’s moderate evidence that better short-term sleep outcomes for disturbed sleep individuals.

Pregnancy and smoking cannabis are correlated with minimal birth weight of the infant.

The evidence for stroke caused by cannabis use is limited and statistical.
Dependence on cannabis and gateway issues are complex, considering many variables which are beyond the scope of the article. These issues are fully discussed in the NAP report.

The NAP report highlights the next findings on the problem of cancer:

The evidence suggests that smoking cannabis does not increase the risk for several cancers (i.e., lung, head and neck) in adults.
There’s modest evidence that cannabis use is connected with one subtype of testicular cancer.

There’s minimal evidence that parental cannabis use during pregnancy is associated with greater cancer risk in offspring.

The NAP report highlights the next findings on the problem of respiratory diseases:

Smoking cannabis regularly is associated with chronic cough and phlegm production.
Quitting cannabis smoking is likely to reduce chronic cough and phlegm production.
It is unclear whether cannabis use is associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, asthma, or worsened lung function.
The NAP report highlights the next findings on the issue of the human immune system:

There exists a paucity of data on the consequences of cannabis or cannabinoid-based therapeutics on the human immune system.
There is insufficient data to draw overarching conclusions regarding the effects of cannabis smoke or cannabinoids on immune competence.

There’s limited evidence to claim that regular exposure to cannabis smoke could have anti-inflammatory activity.
There is insufficient evidence to support or refute a statistical association between cannabis or cannabinoid use and adverse effects on immune status in individuals with HIV.

The NAP report highlights the following findings on the issue of the increased risk of death or injury:

Cannabis use ahead of driving increases the threat of being involved in an automobile accident.
In states where cannabis use is legal, there is increased threat of unintentional cannabis overdose injuries among children.
It really is unclear whether and how cannabis use is connected with all-cause mortality or with occupational injury. minneapolis marijuana dispensary